← All case studies
Case Study · Enterprise SaaS

Cloud architecture, right-sized.

A multi-tenant SaaS was burning $44K a month across 16 Kubernetes clusters with no visibility into what each region actually needed. A 6-week architecture review consolidated the footprint, hardened security, and unlocked $79–132K of annual savings - without slowing a single team down.

Role Staff Technical Account Manager Scope Architecture review, FinOps, Zero-Trust security Timeline 6–8 weeks · 4 regions

The challenge

16 Kubernetes clusters spread across US, UK, EU, and CA. 651 nodes. $44K monthly burn rate climbing every quarter. Security policies fragmented region-by-region because each had been built reactively. And the architecture had no headroom for the AI/ML workloads the product roadmap was promising.

The team didn't lack engineering talent - they lacked a single coherent picture of where the money was going and why.

The approach

What shipped

15–25%
Reduction in monthly cloud spend
$79–132K
Annual savings, modeled and realised
16 → 14
Kubernetes clusters consolidated
651 → 520
Nodes after right-sizing

What I took away

Cost reduction is rarely a tooling problem; it's a clarity problem. The savings were always sitting there - no one had been given the time or the mandate to look at the whole picture at once. Pairing FinOps discipline with a Zero-Trust security re-platform meant the customer didn't have to choose between cheaper and safer. They got both, and a runway for AI on top of it.